|
|||
Yes in deed, if you have
to bring it to that digital |
|||
[Gaussian distribution: A little more men are taller than tall women,
but a little more men are smaller than small Women, too] |
|
And
yes, we do hold men in very high regard. Even if there may by some
modification in case of an individual male behavior,
we do trust in that part of 'menkind', too. And we don't
at all expect boys to wear female clothes (here). Although
wearing original kilts ourselves, and even uniformed - we appreciate variety. And, with our scholars, we do
have some ideological-religious-cultural reservations about particular kinds
of sexual thrill, too. But certainly not if 'in danger;' and we resolutely
try to understand,
how deeply affecting problems transsexual people can actually - but needn't to
- have (which is, as
everybody could know, quite different from 'travesty' in all its meanings and
acts). Anyhow don't be too silly: No one will be
able to estimate what sentence should(!) be passed
on a naughty boy, of any age and status – insulting or harming womenhood(!), by what ever idea and/or use of powers on
her(!). And, as a matter of course, we definitely do recommend as well as
expect males to bow (their knees - not our
backbones
instead), too. |
|
It
all 'starts' (or 'ends up') in thought or
thinking, which
is quite different from our brains: Where male people may need an extra space
for their additional four (to our 19) billions of nerve cells (the/ir cerebral cortex 'consists' of), by – may
that now be, nevertheless or even because of it – at best, just the same average
mind power as women have. Indeed a lot quite old traditions, educational and
behavioural standards, as well / bad as diverse
kinds of 'advantages' are involved – so that 'he' does, and has to, spread
'himself' out (much more than she'll be allowed to, in the big majority of known
civilisations or at least cultures). Although the average man's body is already bigger ... they count more people at the
extremum edges of the spectrums of almost every human items. So, up to that’s, way the skirts of females sometimes
/ ‘certaintimes’ … ? |
|
|||||
[Having a brain, and/or a living
body, does not mean to be it at / after all] |
Never
ever To
express / develop / test our disagreements, sometimes we do use other / not
established words (instead of spelling mistakes), expressions as: ‘menkind’
[men·kind
|| men'kaɪnd]
(including
human beings of all sexes and generations – not only just present ones?) and ‘menhood’
[men·hood || 'menhʊd] (broadening ‘manhood’ to
varieties, not only adults included) more or less ‘masculinities’ not(!) versus more or
less ‘femininities’, even of / by / as
‘womenhood’ [wim·en·hood || 'wɪmenhʊd]
(instead
of contrasting opposition, as complement/compliments?) in different dimensions (of interacting
such as perception/s, Orientation/s and communication/s), opposed to outworn,
occupied understandings. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inge Schwank
1986: "There exist two [sic!]
different cognitive structures in which the thinking
processes are expressed [sic!]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**But
the
Status Questions
are even more ... what ever it actually
may be. |
|
|||||
interesting / difficult / unfair / astonishing / deadly
.... / harder / trickier / |
|
|
|
|
||
Some
inequality is inevitable and ranking needn't be the necessarily result of it. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And
there
are a lot of differences, that often (but not for every individual) correlate with bio-logical sexes
and/or socio-logical genders. |
||||
Scholars
say, that just about 40 % of the ordinary human population are (more or less) pure male or female beings -
according to the (traditionally) ascribed 'natural' characteristics; and the
others are 'mixtures' somewhere 'in between'. Certainly not what may be thought by some
guys, now - but: I.e. someone with an excellent
three-dimensional sight (which is considered 'male') and an extraordinary social communication
talent (considered as typical for women) in a let's
say
biologically distinctively male body.
|
[androgen & figure?] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More papers on that – in particular
studies comparing cultural areas - are going to come. |
|
|
|
Offences or exams wanted to do then. |
|
Statistics
show that, definitely existing, indistinctness on the biological-body level
is mainly limited to effects as unwanted facial hair or on male mammary
glands etc. (which are probably caused by individual hormone balances), but hardly concerns sexual
organs themselves and luckily only seldom primarily sexual characteristics (but with than
sometimes disastrous consequences for people). |
|
|
|
|
||
[‘Right’ or ’wrong’ – it isn’t our country; neither are, good/male ups ‘yes’? and/or bad/female ups ‘no’? the only tow, completely all the categories of every logic] |
Basically (reductional) hypothesis suspects, that the
characteristics (rather 'male' or more 'female') of a person's mental abilities, depend on
the temporary hormonal balance (how much of which sexual hormone is) in the pregnant woman, while this
ability of the new brain is being developed. - Reality my – as
so often – be a bit
more complex (especially many parts of
the, anyhow always developing, brain have
to work together to generate anything, there seem to be very early
'non-sexual' genetic activity differences in all embryos – and where do these just two dichotome
categories come from?), but that simple picture sounds quit vivid and could, at
least, help to imagine 'way' people, even of the same biological sex, are - more than just
a bit - different. |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
We
could agree with a wording to be used, that distinguishes between
'characteristics rather attributed to men' from 'characteristics rather
attributed to women'. And, may by, let's shorten to 'rather female' and
'rather male' or even ordinary symbols. Not
just necessarily classical Mars and Venus sings of (medieval) astrology. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘Chinese’
spelling does ... with a human being plus her full (pregnant?) body versus his use of farm
implement 'under' the rice field. - Mycenaean Greek compared shoulders, hips and
had a, historically irritating, male dress code. - The antique Egyptian also had
her dress and silence emphasised. - You may guess number four, the allegedly
more basically, old Sumerian, yourself/ves, too. |
|
||||
The Passiv (Voice – the subject of the sentence is treated.) |
|
The Active (Voice – the
subject of the sentence
acts.) |
||||
speeking / chatter / running commenting (sitting, svfn together) |
|
thinking / looking (focused) / listenimg
/ acting (by/as walking) |
||||
grace(fullness) |
|
power |
||||
feelings / intuitions |
|
rational calculation |
||||
judgement / inspiration שכינה |
|
mercy / forgiving / forgetting |
||||
seduction / temptation |
|
helplessness |
||||
scheming |
|
simple / crude |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
Pure
versions don't only seem to be impossible on either side of actually 'seamed'/existing
beings at all. |
|
|
|
|
Let's try to compare comparable things (instead). What (kind of) empirical
differences can we find? Some surprises included. |
|
[To say / insist on ‘always, always‘ does mean / prove, that: There
are exceptions] |
||||||
|
|
We have asked the publisher of this site for
some comments and O.G.J. remembers: «One
student, who tried very hard to convince me of human equality - on lower and
lower modalities. She finally ended up
claiming, that the skeleton would be the same 'in' all people. And I could
hardly curb my tongue, not to tell her, at least, one of the most obvious
differences between her innominate bones and a male hip; not to mention age
or feeding‘ differences etc. at all. Yes, she may
well have thought of biochemistry but ... you already know – after all
about allegedly Cartesian distinction between quantity and qualitv.»
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Comp. VFB |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
But comp. |
||||
«Doch hinsichtlich bewusster kinesischer Aspekte an Problemlösung(sstrategi)en: bewegen sich Frauen, nicht allein im europäischen Mittelmeerraum, eher (auch bzw. von sich aus) körperlich selbst - während Männer (sich andere - gar vorzugsweise Frauen - für sich) bewegen lassen.» (Insight by O.G.J.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
«Das ist die Geschichte mit seiner geliebten guten Autojacke, die nach über zwanzig Jahren so plötzlich spurlos verschwunden ist. - 'Während' sie wiedermal vor ihrem durchaus vollen Kleiderschrank steht und wirklich nichts passendes anzuziehen hat. Oder: “Good night, girls, sleep very well! Boys, have you brushed your teeth, now!?“» (O.G.J.) |
|
|
Learning with (not for) boys and girls alike - but in quite
complex, individualized patens of mono- as well as coeducation groups, even
of mixed grades/skills and ability - we realized that some particular boys have even worse educational opportunities
than even deprived girls do – at least in contemporary Western systems /
methodology. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
- - |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
e. g. territorial behaviorems
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It (may
be political or at least rhetorical - but it) is not very helpful to distinguish what is
caused by genetics, biology et al. from leaned abilities! Neither side really
puts away our own responsibility (If actually nature forces you to kill
people, you shall still have to be hindered,
etc. - in fact continuously. Even the best environmental conditions and
optimal, models, teachers etc. do garantie for
nothing.) - and, to be somewhat particular, it is impossible to diside that (at least for living creatures – compare the
famous male crayfish experiment, already on the 'so simple'
shell animale level) in a trustworthy manner. Furthermore we are
able to contradict the current findings. And there
is no need to imitate the sea horses. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
«We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all
human beings are created coequal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, we are called upon to find out without harming
and dominating each other to death.» |
|
|||||||
The choice is yours: |
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
Comments and suggestions are always welcome
(at webmaster@jahreiss-og.de) |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
by |